Happy holidays to all of our readers and best wishes for amazing discoveries in the New Year!
Are you up-to-date on current topics in e-discovery? Here is your chance to get caught up. We’ve crunched the numbers and compiled this selection of our most popular webinar recordings, based on numbers of views. They cover topics ranging from technology assisted review to legal ethics to protecting privilege.
Many vendors these days claim that their technology-assisted review products use a protocol called Continuous Active Learning. But how can you, as an e-discovery professional, be certain about those claims?
The reason this matters is that CAL has been scientifically proven to be superior to other forms of TAR. In a landmark, peer-reviewed study published last year, e-discovery pioneers Maura Grossman and Gordon Cormack demonstrated CAL’s superiority. Their research proved that CAL was far more effective at finding relevant documents (at a much lower cost) than the one-time training methods used by earlier, TAR 1.0 systems. Continue reading
Today is the first-ever E-Discovery Day, celebrating e-discovery’s vital and growing role in the legal process. The day — which is also the day new e-discovery rules take effect in the federal courts — features a full slate of free videocast panels with some of the top professionals in the field addressing a range of cutting-edge topics.
Catalyst is among today’s presenters, with a program at 4 p.m. Eastern time, Using Advanced Analytics Techniques to Meet the Proportionality Requirements of the New Federal Rules. We’ll discuss how advanced analytics techniques such as timelines, visual analytics, faceted search and the latest technology assisted review protocols can help address proportionality requirements while saving on e-discovery costs in the bargain. Continue reading
If you missed Catalyst’s recent webinar, Solving the Transparency Issues in Technology Assisted Review, here is your second chance. The video above is a recording of the full webinar.
What is the transparency issue? Well, if you happened to read U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck’s decision earlier this year in Rio Tinto v. Vale, you have an understanding of why transparency is a concern with regard to the use of TAR. Although TAR is now so widely accepted that it has become—as Judge Peck said—black letter law, there remains significant uncertainty over the degree of transparency and cooperation required with respect to the training sets used in TAR. Continue reading
Among finance and accounting professionals, Lew is best known as the founder of Lew’s List. This is a networking email database of nearly 10,000 finance and accounting members that Lew started in 2003. Today, Lew emails 100-150 job opportunities a month to the list’s members, helping companies find talent and talent find employment. It is the go-to source for finance and accounting jobs in Colorado. Continue reading
On their Digital Detectives podcast this week, hosts Sharon D. Nelson and John W. Simek of Sensei Enterprises interview Bill Hamilton, national e-discovery partner at Quarles & Brady and executive director of the UF Law E-Discovery Project, about Catalyst’s law school e-discovery practicum. Continue reading
What are an attorney’s ethical duties of competence in the handling of discovery of electronically stored information? That will be the topic of a free webinar tomorrow, Oct. 29, from 1 to 2 p.m. Eastern time, sponsored by Catalyst.
The issue has come to the forefront as a growing number of states have recognized that lawyers have an ethical duty to be competent in technology. Recently, a State Bar of California ethics opinion extended that duty of technology competence to e-discovery.
“It’s never too late,” people often say. But is that true for technology assisted review? If a legal team has already put substantial time and effort into manual review, can TAR still be worthwhile? That was the issue presented in a patent infringement case where the client’s approval to use TAR came only after the law firm had manually reviewed nearly half the collection. Even that late in the game, Insight Predict produced substantial savings in time and cost.
Unless you’ve been living in a cave for the last five years, you’ve likely heard about Technology Assisted Review and how it can help reduce the time and cost of document review in e-discovery. But maybe you’ve still never tried it for one of your own cases. Maybe you’ve been on the fence for fear that it won’t really have any value for your case.
If so, here’s your chance to get off the fence. Catalyst this week announced that it is so confident of the effectiveness of its award-winning TAR platform, Insight Predict, that it is putting its money where its mouth is. Catalyst is offering an unconditional, money-back guarantee to anyone who uses Insight Predict on their next case. If you are not completely satisfied with the value you receive using Insight Predict, Catalyst will refund your cost. Continue reading